HoIP - Hypotheses of Intertwined Paradoxes

includes:

Equivalence Principle of Opposites

Elementary Particle Geometry Hypothesis

Hypothesis of the Complex Mind

EPoO | EPGH | HotCM

(1) Pre-Introduction

One might ask where the light may come from. Sure, it comes from the stars, but what was before that?

How did light arise?

In this text I will discuss a topic of high abstraction and theoretical thought. But I have to warn you, there are many brute leaps of thought. Otherwise I tried to write it so that it all makes sense at the end like a final drumbeat. By the way it will lead us to valleys of desperation and to the mountains of enlightenment.

Benevolently I let you plunge into the chaos. And let's see, some may recognize a glimpse of order in it. So close your eyes and begin to see! Embrace chaos, because it is a friend of inspiration and creativity, and enemy of stagnation. But beware! Not every flight in the depths of chaos hides stairs, often there await fathomless abysses and sharp-edged ledges. So take care!

(2) Content

(3) Introduction

This hypothesis is actually three similar hypotheses composed to one. The EPoO hypothesis is the philosophical and partly mathematical part, whilst the EPGHypothesis takes the entire ideas to the level of theoretical physics. My target is, straight-forwardly said, to form a base for the Grand Unification Theory (or „Theory of Everything) in physics (or whatever this hypotheses will become). I know it is a hard and somewhat naive to think I can achieve that, but if one does not even begin to try how can we even progress? In the end we learn through our mistakes. That's the least I can do. Those who never do mistakes never learn something new.

"Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible."

- attributed to M. C. Escher

And in the very journey of discovering these thoughts and intertwined connections of many different hypotheses from all the different sciences it will form a highly abstract, yet beautiful, and somewhat elegant holistic result.

However, if it will contain the mathematical elegance and beauty, we'll see and I will do my best to proof it – even if that means to „step outside“ the conventional methods.

One of my leading concepts is summed up in the following quote pretty well:

"It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of a mathematical theory of great beauty and power,..."

- Mathematician Paul Dirac, in "The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature" in Scientific American (May 1963)

In the chapter (5) The main principles and assumptions of HoIP I try to start with as few assumptions as possible and make some implications of it (- therfor I used a nested design to make it better visible).

(3.1) Metaphorical jigsaw puzzles

These hypotheses are a result of thinking for myself since I can remember. Every thought, may it be true or false, transformed and shaped further thoughts. Many false ones got extinct, some changed so they became true. - But what do I want to explain?

As I was a child, like 5 or 6 years old, I once said to my mother "Life is like a jigsaw puzzle." I never realized how true this was until I came to the conclusion that every jigsaw puzzle piece is an entire jigsaw puzzle game itself. This gives this entire analogy a very recursive and nested nature.

One can substitute a fact with a subordinated hypothesis itself - so said.

An example: The fact is: "Nothing can travel faster than light speed."

The subordinated hypothesis: "Nothing can travel faster than light, because something would collapse into a black hole if it travels faster than light speed, because of the very high kinetic energy."

(3.2) A brief history of the hypotheses

I also have to say that the entire "orderly seeming" text here was once even more messy - it actually started with the Elementary Particle Geometry Hypothesis (EPGH) in the end of 2013, whose name changed multiple times in the beginning. One name was "Sub-Elementary Particle Dynamics" for instance. Now I think that EPGH fits the best.

It all started with my passion for physics in the beginning of the same year. I read a lot of books, most were about superstring theory.

The philosophical concept crystallized itself in course of time; and finally, in February 2016 I had another good idea; The EPoO was born!

As I began to read "Gödel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas R. Hofstadter around that time it brought me forward in all my ideas and concepts.

As I read about Synergetics first in April 2016 I already knew it has to be mentioned in my hypotheses. Later I will explain what this is.

In June 2017 I added the Hypothesis of the Complex Mind (HotCM) to this collection of hypotheses. It evolved from an epiloque I wrote for the EPoO and EPG Hypotheses and it gained more and more complexity and became another kind of key role for the Hypotheses of Intertwined Paradoxes (or shortly HoIP).

(3.3) Metamathematics and how one can regain control over the own mind

Today, the eleventh of February 2018, I came back to my almost 5-year old hypothesis. A lot of time passed since I wrote latest. I think it was on June 20th of last year when I wrote here.

Again my brain seems to accumulate something huge and complex; And my thoughts seem so foreign to me, and yet, I have to say, I do know them well already.

I gave away my thinking to my inner demons for far too long, and yet, I'd say, they seem to be pure geniuses. It fascinates me to look into the world of the multi-dimensional broadband thinking, and yet something plaques me; to fathom the fathomless!